Respect voor dieren

dinsdag 6 januari 2015

Terroriseren van baby's

.
Animal research practices at a National Institutes of Health (NIH) facility in Poolesville, Maryland, USA, are being challenged by four members of Congress, who have asked the NIH director to commission a bioethical review of experiments being conducted on monkeys at the lab.
-
For the past 30 years, the Laboratory of Comparative Ethology, which is run by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), has conducted maternal deprivation experiments on hundreds of infant macaques that are bred to carry different versions of genes known to be risk factors for mental illnesses in humans.
-
Starting soon after birth, the baby monkeys are reportedly subjected to fear, stress, and pain-inducing tests; half are separated from their mothers to assess the effects of maternal deprivation.
-
In a December 22 letter to NIH Director Francis Collins, the representatives – Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA), Dina Titus (D-NV), Sam Farr (D-CA) and Eliot Engel (D-NY) – point out that “prominent experts . . . have raised questions about the scientific and ethical justification of these particular experiments.”
“To date,” they write, “NIH’s various responses to members of the public and Members of Congress about this subject have not adequately addressed these concerns. In view of this, we are requesting that your office commission a Bioethics Consultation of these experiments . . . and provide us with a Consultation Report by February 27, 2015.”
-
According to the letter from the Congressional representatives, the maternal deprivation research at the Poolesville facility has “been going on since 1983, receives millions of taxpayer dollars each year and is currently approved to continue through 2017.”
-
A spokesperson for Rep. Farr told Reuters Health by email that reports in the news about painful experiments on the baby monkeys “are troubling” and Rep. Farr and the other representatives “are asking for the report so they have a full understanding of exactly what experiments are being performed.” 
An NIH spokesperson confirmed that the agency had received the letter and was preparing a response.
A spokesperson for Dr. Stephen Suomi, Chief of the Laboratory of Comparative Ethology, wrote in an email to Reuters Health, “The NIH is preparing a response and Dr. Suomi has been in touch with Dr. Collins’ office. Dr. Suomi hopes you will understand, however, that it would not be appropriate for him to comment outside of NIH’s response to the original Congressional inquiry.”
Dr. Alka Chandna, senior laboratory oversight specialist for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), told Reuters Health there have been no publicly-documented developments in the treatment of human mental illness resulting from these NIH studies.
Meanwhile, he added, “sophisticated human-based methodologies, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), have yielded important insights into human mental illness and are paving the path forward.”
-
“Given the harm caused to animals, the experiments’ limited relevance to humans, the substantial financial cost, and the existence of superior non-animal research methods, the continued use of animals in this work is scientifically and ethically unjustifiable,” Chandna told Reuters in an email.
PETA is calling on the NIH to end these specific experiments immediately. 
“In light of the tremendous physical and psychological harm done to primates used in these NIH experiments and the absence of any gains made as a result, it would seem to be amply clear that these experiments simply cannot be justified,” Chandna said. 

Bron: http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/12/25/us-nih-ethics-baby-monkeys-idUSKBN0K300120141225

4 opmerkingen:

  1. Vreselijk. Ik wist al jaren hiervan.

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  2. Helaas worden deze (zeer bekende) studies al bijna 100 jaar uitgevoerd (in de jaren 30 door Harlow voor zijn attachment theory, 'gehechtheidstheorie' in het Nederlands). Zie: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Harlow

    Moeder en kind werden gescheiden en men bestudeerde het gedrag en de zeer negatieve gevolgen. De psychische schade kon nooit meer goedgemaakt worden.
    Vooral Bowlby en is daar bekend mee geworden.

    ‘Dankzij’ de oorlog waren er veel weeskinderen en zo had hij veel ‘proefkonijntjes’ en kon hij de nefaste gevolgen bij kinderen bestuderen.

    Er werden ook beruchte ‘onderzoeken’ gedaan met kleine kinderen (natuurlijk van lage sociale klassen), weeskinderen, een bekend voorbeeld is de Kleine Albert : Zie het artikel in Quest: http://www.quest.nl/artikel/baby-pesten-enge-experimenten

    Onlangs kwam nog aan het licht over testen met weeskinderen. Ik dacht, als ik me niet vergis, tot in de jaren 70. Kinderen en dieren zijn gemakkelijke weerloze slachtoffers

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  3. Over 'Little Albert' moet ik het hier al eens gehad hebben, kan het helaas niet terugvinden. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Albert_experiment

    Het wordt wel tijd dat hier een eind aan komt. Let op: dit is Maryland, geen obscure Mid West-staat.

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  4. Frederik de Grote had kinderen door kinderverzorgsters alleen laten verzorgen zonder ze te laten liefkozen. Die baby's zijn naar ik meen allemaal gestorven. Laten we ook niet vergeten dat kalfjes vaak meteen bij de moeder worden weggehaald.

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen